Methodology
Standards over speculation.
Every report follows a disciplined analytical spine. Sources are cited. Probability ranges are explicit. Where the evidence is contested, the dispute is named.
The 8-question spine
Every report answers eight questions.
No commentary. No opinion masquerading as analysis. Each report walks the same disciplined sequence so the reader knows where to find what they need.
-
I
What happened?The factual core. Who did what. When. With what visible consequence.
-
II
Why does it matter?Decision-relevance. The strategic mechanism by which this event reshapes exposure.
-
III
Who benefits?Named winners. State and non-state. Capital flows toward.
-
IV
Who is exposed?Named losers. Exposed counterparties. Capital at risk.
-
V
What changes in 30, 90, and 180 days?Time-bracketed forecast. Specific. Falsifiable.
-
VI
What are the early-warning indicators?Observable variables that move first if the scenario activates. Trackable.
-
VII
What is the probability-weighted scenario map?Three or four named scenarios. Each with explicit probability band. The strongest case against our base case is stated.
-
VIII
What should sovereigns, corporates, and capital allocators do?Action-grade implication. Not commentary. Specific exposure adjustments and timing.
Probability bands
Words map to numbers.
When an SAD report says "likely" or "plausible", it means a specific probability range. The same vocabulary appears across every publication so readers can calibrate quickly.
Report formats
Three formats. Three price points.
Briefs are free. Long-form analysis is paid. Bespoke commissions are confidential.
Short-form weekly notes. 150 to 200 words. Topical. Pseudonymous byline. Updated each Sunday across our coverage areas. The starting point for staying current.
Long-form decision-grade analysis. The full 8-question spine. Probability-weighted scenarios. Named counter-strategies. Self-critique section that surfaces the strongest case against the conclusion. PDF delivery.
One country. All vectors. Political stability, debt sustainability, FX reserves, capital controls, expropriation risk, regulatory reliability. Used by allocators, sovereign lenders, and corporates evaluating jurisdictional exposure.
Sources and self-critique
Cited. Bracketed. Honest about doubt.
Sources are cited inline. Where the evidence permits only a directional view, that limit is stated. Where two informed observers disagree, the disagreement is described before our base case is taken.
Every long-form report contains a dedicated self-critique section. We name the strongest argument against our base case and explain why we still hold the position we do. This is the discipline that separates analysis from advocacy.
Authors publish under pseudonyms. The work stands on its own.
Bespoke Advisory
Custom analysis for sovereign and corporate clients.
For ministries, sovereign wealth funds, defence primes, and major financial institutions, we produce confidential strategic assessments tailored to specific portfolios, jurisdictions, or operational questions.
Discuss an engagement